Quote:
Originally Posted by canbyte
Many folks cannot be so sanguine as you are about "how markets are structured" with all this shorting and naked shorting that cheats honest people out of their savings, destroys companies/ jobs, markets, even whole economies, distorts markets and market information, dishonestly fabricates duplicates/ phoney shares, borrows without notice, and gives perverse incentives to distort, manipulate and deregulate. Shorting undermines trust in the entire system.
Readers can do their part to abolish shorting at
http://www.petitiononline.com/shortNOT/petition.html
follow links therein for info
|
Very interesting point. I agree with Ted Butler that shorting is a normal part of market function, but I certainly agree that naked shorting (i.e. without the underlying commodity to back it) is harmful to the system.
If I am not mistaken, I believe GATA.org pointed out that shorts in the COMEX are required to have 90% on hand to cover, which
none of the market manipulators likely do. The fact that this provision is already within the regulations means that the key issue is
enforcement of the regulations--which is Mr. Butler's exact point..
.they are not enforcing the existing rules of trade.
Thus, I agree in-part with the principle of the petition, but it seems to be a hollow in practice. If the
current laws are
not enforced, and the regulatory agency in charge is complicit and/or negligent, then the agenda of the petition is somewhat moot...is it not? Nonetheless, I agree that naked shorts are especially dangerous in the commodities markets because it grossly distorts
everything.
Personally: I would (in the short term) consider it more advantageous to focus our efforts on pressuring the CFTC to do their job, or even on legal action against the CFTC. This would seem to me to have a more immediate and substantive affect on the situation at hand, rather than fighting to gain more laws only for the CFTC to
fail to enforce them too.
-
Rich Vermillion