Quote:
Originally Posted by prahudka
Isn't amazing that Jesus became violent (putting aside Jericho, Sodom, etc) one time -- with the money changers? What is the most specific and detailed prophecy in the Bible? That which deals with global fiat money (the mark) and the government of those who impose it. And we know how that ends.
|
Interestingly, the word generally translated "money changers" in three of those four passages where Jesus kicks out the folks in the temple is actually better translated "money clippers" from the original Greek in which the NT was written (Strong's# 2855). Thayer's Lexicon says, "a small coin, clipped; rate of exchange, premium..." and Holman's Bible Dictionary says that the term "referred to the exchange rate or commission."
The "fee" which was charged was 12 grains of silver (Holman's) to convert
debased and
pagan Roman coins to the purer Tyrian drachma (as a substitute for the half-shekel) for the annual temple tax. That coin was about 65-70 grains, which would make the premium for exchange at about 18%. So THAT is what infuriated Jesus... in addition to the high prices for the "approved" sacrificial animals being sold there. In other words, Jesus was for a
free market in both
worship as well as general commerce; but
against officially sanctioned monopolies that exploited God's people. I plan to write on this topic later in an upcoming (and free) eBook that will be offered off my blog and elsewhere.
On the "mark of the beast" topic: It will likely be an implanted micro-chip system, that eliminates printed currency and coinage. Given the "SDR" talk of the global system nowadays, it might even be gold-based in
pretense (copying GoldMoney's idea), but since nobody sees the gold you can guess how honest that system will be.
Lastly, you will be happy to know that, according to the Bible, the anti-Christ does
NOT get the entire planet for his control OR his bizarre monetary system.

He (and his evil cronies) get just the approximate "footprint" of the former Roman Empire. However, this topic I have already expounded upon
on my blog in this article, so I will refrain from doing so at length here.
My apologies to Mr. Butler for writing so much in this post on his discussion thread. I want to be polite in the use of other's internet resources, so I am cutting this short. Nevertheless, I did not want to miss an opportunity to reply to the sincere question posed to me at least in some measure.
In Jesus,
-Rev. Rich Vermillion